The Whole Person Approach to Health Care |
www.wphtrust.com |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME ABOUT US WHOLE PERSON RESOURCES LINKS SITE MAP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
|
This chapter has been contributed by James Ashdown - my own thoughts are at the bottom of the page
This chapter will be looking at some tools that are available for changing the way we experience illness and which can make real a holistic approach to medicine for the individual sufferer. It will be particularly geared to the individual suffering from chronic illness. In some ways it is a reflection on the NHS expert patients programme as outlined in the handbook Self-Management of Long-Term Health Conditions -- a handbook for people with chronic disease 2002. The handbook is useful because it illustrates an emerging approach to chronic pain and reflects many contemporary attitudes. Although I have not myself participated in the expert patient program I have participated in a similar programme run at St Thomas's Hospital to help people manage their chronic pain. Although these kinds of programmes are a positive innovation, personally I have found them somewhat limited particularly because of the lack of attention to issues of spirituality or meaning and it is this which I will first address. You can choose to: In the first chapter it gives seven self-management steps which involve deciding what you want to achieve, planning to achieve them, putting your plans into action and giving yourself a reward. I'm sure people do find this useful but something about it always makes me feel uncomfortable. In particular I never liked the idea of rewards -- I don't want to give myself rewards, it makes me feel like child who's been given a sweet for being good. There is a different way of experiencing illness and medicine, described by Dostoevsky in his obscure but brilliant book Notes from Underground when I first read this as a teenager it was a revelation I thought "Yes this is what life is really like". It starts: I am a sick man... I am an angry man. I am an unattractive man. I think there is something wrong with my liver. But I don't understand the least thing about my illness, and I don't know for certain what part of me is affected. I'm not having any treatment for it, and never have had, although I have the greatest respect for medicine and for doctors... I refuse treatment out of spite. That is something you will probably not understand. Well, I understand it. I can't of course explain who my spite is directed against in this matter; I know better than anybody that I am harming nobody but myself. All the same, if I don't have treatment, it is out of spite. Is my liver out of order? -- let it get worse! We live in a very rational world. It is all targets and outcomes, success and achievements, rewards and the little luxuries that make life sweet. But as was demonstrated in the recent BBC TV series Life on Mars, with its return to the messy world of the 1970s, this orderly rational world can be very dull. Sometimes, especially when we are pushed to the edge, we want to return to something more real, more visceral... more human. This is the problem with the Expert Patient Programme, at least as described in the book -- I suspect and am told that the actual meetings when people get together are much more real. Rationality is only a secondary tool, healing perhaps springs from a more emotional and visceral place -- what I call spirituality. Spirituality, in its modern usage, is essentially about the meaning that we find or give to life. It is, perhaps, where we can hold together the rational, sensible parts of us with those more emotional and visceral reactions to life which tend to come to the fore when we are ill. In the struggle with illness -- especially chronic illness, we need to develop a confidence in our own ability to survive. This may not necessarily be a confidence in our ability to overcome the illness -- death or disability may be inevitable but we need to find some way of feeling that we are still worthwhile and retain a basic human dignity. Again there are different ways of finding this confidence. The way other people treat us will have a big effect -- if our illness is distrusted by friends and family it will take a very strong personality to hold onto self-confidence. Similarly if we feel God is punishing us and there is no way out, this can be oppressive and restrict our ability to respond effectively to our illness. But any sense of being loved -- whether that is human or divine, will strengthen us and give us some perspective on our illness. We do need perspective and here the calm rationality of the expert patient approach can be helpful -- the battle can't be fought just by the soldier on the front line we need the general's eye view from the hilltop. This will help us make sensible decisions and improve our condition. We therefore need the courage and strength to fight our illness on the front line of pain and anguish but this needs to go hand-in-hand with a wider perspective: a rational weighing up of options, a determination to pursue programmes which will help us and the wisdom to resist things that don't help us. This will also enable us to co-operate with people who can help us -- family and friends but also doctors. The expert patient programme is certainly correct in saying that we can make choices about our illness. There is no illness, apart from states of unconsciousness, that won't benefit from us deciding to take responsibility for ourselves and manage things as best as we can. But we must also be gentle with ourselves, recognising the powerful emotional forces that are unleashed in us and that being sensible and rational is not always the best approach. Illness is a crucible for the formation of the human spirit. It can literally make us or break us. The expert patient model provides a template for this more controlled life although I suspect that few people actually follow it religiously -- in fact I suspect that it operates in much the same way as the monastic ideal did in mediaeval times. It is aspirational and does affect practice but does not very accurately described most chronically ill people's day-to-day life. Verity Reds Diary -- a story of surviving ME, an interesting but not altogether satisfactory fictionalisation of the life of an ME sufferer is constructed round this struggle with the ideal of orderly control which ultimately gives way to a strange kind of new age fantasy. It is a kind of modern day Notes from Underground and again illustrates the limits of rational approach is to chronic illness. No doubt different people will find different approaches helpful. What seems important is to find some process of planning and/or control which will enable the individual to change his/her experience from a random succession of pain, depression and disappointment into something which makes sense and has some sense of journey and purpose to it. Chronic illness and the struggle with it is not about returning to where we were previously but it is about a journey into a new place which, while it may not be full of peace and joy, can at least be expected to have some hope, love and a sense of meaning. • Honesty and self-awareness. There are political issues around disability which need to be addressed and there is a time for confrontation but if this does not go hand-in-hand with an honest self-awareness of our own situation it will, ultimately, be detrimental for us. We need to be honest about what we are experiencing and aware of how this makes us feel -- there is no point trying to make out everything is okay when inside we are seething with anger or overwhelmed with vulnerability. Illness often increases our self-awareness and this is why it is often experienced at a time of personal growth. Hard as it may feel, the pain and loss of illness can be transformed into something positive and life enhancing. Not that we can force this to happen, or in any way feel that this should happen but being honest with ourselves and becoming more aware of what we are feeling will, I would suggest, open us up to new possibilities. Patient-doctor communication has become an increasingly important area. People are realising that it is a key to 'better health outcomes'. There is, however, a tendency for doctors to criticise patience for 'non-compliance' and other forms of 'bad behaviour' whilst patient organisations are often critical of supercilious doctors who treat patients with arrogance. The situation is, of course, more complex so it is good to see doctors making comments like this "In looking at these 36 studies we learned many things. For example, research on non-adherence to doctor's instructions has focused on bad or poor behavior by patients rather than on the clarity of the physician's instructions or whether the physician actually checked to see if his or her instructions were understood by the patient. The physician assumed that the patient understands and thus will comply.” Richard Frankel, Ph.D., IU School of Medicine professor of medicine and Regenstrief Institute research scientist If doctors can look at their communications skills then it should also be incumbent on patients to look at their own! Communication, anyway, is a two-way process -- good communication to one person is bad communication to another. We need to find an appropriate way of communicating with the different people who need to know something about our illness. Doctors, parents, children and employers will all need a different message and different personalities and intellectual capacities will need to be taken into account. I have certainly found that writing about my own experience has been helpful to my family in understanding what I'm experiencing and in the same way that my self exploration can help others it is also certainly true that making the effort to communicate with others can give you more insight into your own condition. Illness is not something that we experience on our own. It makes us dependent on others and good communication is a key to turning this into a helpful interdependence rather than an exercise in mutual incomprehension. This is, I suppose, an example of being a noncompliant patient. I just didn't like the idea of taking antidepressants -- even in a small dose not designed to treat depression. Of course it would have been better if the consultant had fully explained the situation before asking for my consent rather than asking the obscure question about taking drugs. My mother says that even as a small boy I would be reluctant to do anything until it was fully explained and I am exactly the same now. I need to have a high level of knowledge about something before I really engage with it. I would have had a better experience of doctors if I had been fully aware of this and was more upfront about asking for explanation. Not that this would necessarily have helped, there are plenty of doctors without the time, inclination or skill to give me the kind of level of explanation that I really need. Although our medical culture seems to be increasingly encouraging the assertive and empowered patient there are doubts about whether our systems can cope with this. It requires time and a maturity on all sides which is not easy to achieve. Nonetheless the ability to be assertive without being aggressive does seem to me to be a key gateway to improving one's health. I have often found that saying no to treatment has been important for me because I have had to give myself more time to think and reflect on my experience. Any treatment is more effective when it can be undertaken from a place of confident belief rather than speculative wishful thinking. Much of the expert patient handbook is about techniques. Techniques for taking exercise, techniques for communicating better, techniques for eating and managing medicines -- even techniques for enjoying sex. This is very helpful and most people will find that there are certain techniques and skills which will be useful to them -- even crucial. I would certainly say that about trigger points. Successful techniques are important for a number of reasons: 1. The concrete decrease in pain or increase in functioning which they can achieve But techniques do not always work. When therapists confidently tell you that you will experience improvements and you don't it can be a real dent to your confidence. Techniques are not solutions but part of a management package that you have to put together over time and in which you will become expert -- the recognition of this is one of the strengths of the expert patient program. The other side of this was brought home painfully to me when I was pastoring a church in south London. A lovely, gentle older woman had started coming to the church but she became ill and I went to visit her at her home. I was immediately struck by the strange atmosphere in the home which she shared with her brothers and son and as she began to share her family history her struggles with her mental health seemed to be largely a very reasonable reaction to the poisonous environment in which she lived. A little while later she was admitted to hospital and eventually received ECT, this seemed to revive her and arrangements were put in place for her to move out of the hospital into a flat with her son. But the flat she was offered was in need of extensive redecoration and this immediately depressed her, sending her back into a spiral of degeneration. I felt completely impotent in the situation -- what could I offer? I could not offer her a new family, or a new community in which this gentle soul might find some healing, even though this was very obviously what she needed. So often the quality of our relationships is the key to healing and yet how do you provide new relationships for someone else? Doctors, councillors and therapists of all kinds can only provide a very limited form of relationship. People often seem to be looking for a truly nurturing relationship so that they can escape from the poisonous entanglements in which they are ensnared. This points to the fact, that useful as interventions might be, it is only in the day-to-day realities of our lives that any healing will truly be found and paying attention to mundane experiences should be our first priority. From this point I have slowly began to improve. True, finding the trigger point technique has been important but there has also been an important process of accepting my weak humanity -- I am not the strong competent man I would like to think I am but rather I am frail, self-deluding and not so different from that weak, gentle member of my congregation for whom I could do nothing. Which is not to say I do not have strength or significant competencies but I must let go of them if I am to gain the wisdom that I need. This is one of the stranger insights that I've gained on my journey. I do not understand it. Certainly it is out of tune with those self-improvement gurus who tell us to believe in ourselves and discover our self-esteem and also with our cutthroat, competitive world of the market. Yet it seems to me that to let go, to recognise that I can't cope, to recognise that the world is too big for me, is only being honest. When we experience chronic illness the myth of masterful humanity disappears: we are not able to manage the planet, we cannot even manage our own bodies! We have failed, and there is no shame in accepting this, rather it is a place from which to start. A place from which to rebuild our idea of what a human being is. A starting point which includes illness rather than seeks to banish it. Perhaps, in encouraging us to let go of our notions of world mastery, chronic illness has something to offer our fragile world. And to recognise that our chronic illness might give us gifts to share with others could be a crucial step on a path to healing. MY COMMENTS SUGGESTED CONTENTS by Mike Sheldon
|
You may download a PDF file of this chapter. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated January 27, 2008 | Home > Handbook Index > Handbook Chapter 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||